Me & my speech.

Posts tagged ‘history’

#11- Visual PAIN Diary- 2013 Stressed Injury

Continuing from post- #10- A PAIN & Injury Diary MAY Change Inaccurate Doctoral ASSESSMENTS- Maybe the pain & injury diary can grow value in pain assessments as well as more accurate treatments. Like

  • what if the doctors had a visual flip-book relating the pain as well as the injury progressing as I have suffered?
  • what if the medical community had made assessments accurately for me instead of basing things on their own personal ratings of my pain estimates?…

September 2013

2013 Forearm Brace against fall pressure collapse ache that varied from the fall and diminished in generally over months.

  • I had passed out for over 30 minutes.
  • The work done in the previous years of college with jobs as well as taking on the care of grades didn’t happen.
  • I was exhausted all of the time.
    • For the time after that fall, I remained in college until graduation taking a full course load, but not doing the extra work previously practiced during my college time.
    • The injurious fall that caused the faint was from my right calf, a multiple fracture was displayed on the one X-ray of June 10th, 2014.
    • The X-ray was left unexamined by all my doctors.
  • My one viewing of the 6-10-2014 right calf X-ray showed a dancer’s fracture of the inner back Tibia, but as the hospital ‘lost’ the picture I have not received any treatment.
  • Antibiotics were being used by me early in June 2014, the pain went away for a time.  An itchy calf had me rubbing it, and I pushed in part of the unhealed calf fracture.

And this is only part of my calf story, further mishaps are causing more problems, but there are only mentions with this section, because we are sharing a Visual PAIN Timeline for the LEFT FOREARM.

But please be aware there are multiple associated accounts because of the weaknesses growing from a lack of a care as well as the need for proper treatments…

Associated Posts

Please forgive me, but you’ll likely want to right click and open in a new tab, because the click link MAY NOT WORK.

#01. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments CAN CAUSE MORE BODY DAMAGE

#02- PAIN Assessments Corresponding with UTI’s

#03. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with A HIGH PAIN Tolerance

#04- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with JUST Rate Pain from 0 to 10

#05- Inaccurate Doctoral PAIN Assessments based on Guesses

#06- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments because of no Patient Pain Understanding

#07- Inaccurate PAIN Ratings with NO Applicable Associations

#08- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments MADE a BIT Better

#09- Detailing Diaries Could Limit Inaccurate PAIN Assessments

#10- A PAIN & Injury Diary MAY Change Inaccurate Doctoral ASSESSMENTS

A VISUAL TIMELINE- From September 2013 into April 2017

#11- 2013 Stressed Injury & #12- & #13- & #14- & #15- & #16- & #17- & #18- & #19- & #20- &

#10- A PAIN & Injury Diary MAY Change Inaccurate Doctoral ASSESSMENTS

Continuing from the previous post- #09- Detailing Diaries Could Limit Inaccurate PAIN Assessments–  The bone injury assessments aren’t as easy for the doctors to see after time continues to pass. BUT let me demonstrate how the detailing could add value to visual assessments by medical professionals..

8-10-2000 Original Injury Sketch

This was from a car accident! The original accident was with the weight bearing bone of my left arm. According to medical information, “Often a fracture of the mid shaft of the ulna is not associated with an injury at the elbow or the wrist, [TRUE WITH ME]. It can be treated with a long arm cast, or with surgery. Plates and screws or intramedullary pins are both effective treatments.” With my car accident the picture is my memory of the injury.

Bone fracture repair is used when a broken bone does not or would not heal properly with casting or splinting alone. Improper healing that requires ORIF surgery can occur in cases when the bone is sticking through the skin (compound fractures)…” This is consistent with the injury that I had.

The orthopedic specialist that did the surgery told me that the lack of inflammation and coloring was very abnormal. He also told me that my bone density was super high, a very good reason to expect that the screws would need to be taken away at a later time. The experimental straight plate material that was put in my arm & the external padded brace was wrapped around the bandage holding the staples and 4.5 inch scar in place.

Of course I can only share with you my visual memories, but the pain assessments can’t be accurate because I was drugged with the emergency ambulatory care.  The visual memory is from being awoken by the doctor so that the hospital could get my desire for treatment.

In that situation my pinky toe on my left foot which was dislocated hurt worse than my arm, it distracted me from really feeling any problem with my arm.  The localized pain killer had not been applied for surgery.

2000 Injury Scar & 2005 Scar after Screws were Removed

The information shared with the section about My Pain Tolerance is HIGH (A Self Assessment describes how the work in my arm resulted in minimal injury.  As stated previously the INACCURATE ASSESSMENT of the PAIN & the CT results by the other hospital could have caused other major body problems, but I knew my body better and worked to get the proper care.  The specialist did NOT base his estimates on my pain statements, BECAUSE before seeing me he had taken the time to do a proper visual survey of the evidence because I had made sure that he got the visuals so that the inaccurate technical reports of the other hospital weren’t his only evidence about the situation.

The day of the surgery after the screws were removed the surgeon who took care of the problem said that, “the screws holding the plate on my arm were removed with my fingers, they were barely in the bone.” This was after I asked why the scar bandage was so small in comparison to the whole plate scar that I had, it was less than 2 inches long while the original plate scar is over 4.5 inches long.

A visual reminder for you of my scar of 2005:

In general with a full plate removal, according to another medical document, from the Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2009 Vol 3 No 1 “…Refracture is the most common complication following removal of implant… The forearm should also be protected from heavy loads by splinting for [2] to [4] weeks…”

BUT FOR ME IN 2005, my screws were removed by hand & as more evidence that the PLATE WAS NOT removed I was told by the professional surgeon, “you can return to work like normal tomorrow, there are no restrictions.”  So on my return to work, 4 days after the surgery, the next week because of the extra days I’d previously taken was abnormal for a plate removal.

The plate in my arm has aggravated the present pain situation and proper doctoral assessments, even though the doctors have not heard me because they have been misled by INACCURATE reports based on other inaccurate reports & BAD PAIN Assessments.

This visual addition along with my information from #03. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with A HIGH PAIN Tolerance and other posts can assist others to see in some ways why the Summer 2014 injury care action taken by me did not result in the better care results from doctor’s.

Detailing Information Visually

Maybe the pain & injury diary can grow value in pain assessments as well as more accurate treatments. Like

  • what if the doctors had a visual flip-book relating the pain as well as the injury progressing as I have suffered?
  • what if the medical community had made assessments accurately for me instead of basing things on their own personal ratings of my pain estimates?…

Associated Posts

Please forgive me, but you’ll likely want to right click and open in a new tab, because the click link MAY NOT WORK.

#01. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments CAN CAUSE MORE BODY DAMAGE

#02- PAIN Assessments Corresponding with UTI’s

#03. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with A HIGH PAIN Tolerance

#04- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with JUST Rate Pain from 0 to 10

#05- Inaccurate Doctoral PAIN Assessments based on Guesses

#06- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments because of no Patient Pain Understanding

#07- Inaccurate PAIN Ratings with NO Applicable Associations

#08- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments MADE a BIT Better

#09- Detailing Diaries Could Limit Inaccurate PAIN Assessments

#10- A PAIN & Injury Diary MAY Change Inaccurate Doctoral ASSESSMENTS

Rhapsodie’s Visual PAIN Diary- From September 2013 into April 2017

 Rhapsodie’s ideas to improve Medical ASSESSMENTS by doctors

PAIN Variables

 

#08- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments MADE a BIT Better

As ended the previous post #07- Inaccurate PAIN Ratings with NO Applicable Associations- Notice how I varied that doctor’s statement.  It was done, in my estimate, because my doctors have taken it upon themselves to offer assessments based on their inaccurate work & because I had not read through this article with articulation for the types of pain to share previously.  This means there is a need for doctors to supply for patient’s corresponding information that can be related to by the doctor & other medical people too so we as patient’s aren’t inaccurately mislabeled or inaccurately cared for.

Rhapsodie’s ways to share more accurately pain feelings with doctors

The pain specialist information from WebMD can be used, but without having corresponding visuals doctors are likely to make inaccurate assessments.  The National Institute on Pain Control (NIPC) has a great way of assessing pain given for FREE to patients and doctors, but none of my medical practitioners have used it.  Getting this printed AND filled in for your doctors COULD greatly assist them in evaluating you and me also.

Detailing the reinjury to my lower left arm, as was never done till now, during the summer of 2014 after taking a twisting fall in 2013 then again around Father’s Day 2014 causing further problems.  Added to me by the self care for my bone popping as I was carrying some envelopes of mail up from the mailbox was NOT detailed by anyone.

Instead of taking a picture with my camera, I stood in the yard and pushed the bone down away from the skin.

  • But what if I had done more?
  • What if I had taken photos, instead of working myself out of the pain by moving the bone?
  • What if I had done a running visual report for the doctors to look at?

I don’t think they would have found anything with images, because my dense bones and the plate disguised the reinjury, but at least I could have visuals to share. But it hurt and for me, the way to minimize the hurt was to realign the bone more properly, then and there as I was walking into the house with the mail.

The medical reports as followed were only based on the wonderful ‘rate your pain from 0 to 10, and the doctors added me to a chronic pain complainer with NO ACCURATE TREATMENT ALSO.

Basic Visuals to Share

As NO VISUAL EVIDENCE was there for the doctors to view AND no one has even taken accurate visual assessments of that arm even though there are reports made with no visual evidence because it was falsified.  An ultrasound of that arm is unlikely to cause a lot of pain, is safe, and is non-invasive.  It also is cheaper than an MRI or a CT scan, but it has not been done.

But presently on top of wanting accurate treatment, I really wish the doctor’s did more than read inaccurate assessments done by the same hospital that couldn’t even discern that screws were coming out of that arm back in 2005.  My desire for that also includes having them relate to my pain properly.

Look at how the assessment is done in split assessments with both visual AND by descriptions, partially detailed from the work shared by the National Institute on Pain Control (NIPC):

They are asking you the patient in pain to make mark or color in the pain so that doctors can see it.  Also there is a packet of information that includes questions relating to the pain and the feel of it.  The question below is 20 out of 20; showing that there is way more investigative than most doctoral assessments.

This can assist in getting more accurate assessments if the doctors saw how variables shifted and changed with time and situations if they made any assessment beyond the simplified give us an estimate of your pain, rate it from 0 to 10.

Just having charted this information, maybe with multiple copies of this pain chart can add to the doctor’s knowledge if the patient is using the reports to show how the pain varies with the incidences and the work done that causes the pain to result.

Because of my pain WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN CHRONIC, shifting and changing based on actions and bone shifting having different time ratings to add the colors to the pictures is useful.  But there is more like the detailing that for me is necessary because there is no reference when doctors only see you every 6 months or when there is a specific problem, THAT THEY HAVE RECOGNIZED…

Associated Posts

Please forgive me, but you’ll likely want to right click and open in a new tab, because the click link MAY NOT WORK.

#01. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments CAN CAUSE MORE BODY DAMAGE

#02- PAIN Assessments Corresponding with UTI’s

#03. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with A HIGH PAIN Tolerance

#04- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with JUST Rate Pain from 0 to 10

#05- Inaccurate Doctoral PAIN Assessments based on Guesses

#06- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments because of no Patient Pain Understanding

#07- Inaccurate PAIN Ratings with NO Applicable Associations

#08- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments MADE a BIT Better

#09- Detailing Diaries Could Limit Inaccurate PAIN Assessments

#10- A PAIN & Injury Diary MAY Change Inaccurate Doctoral ASSESSMENTS

Rhapsodie’s Visual PAIN Diary- From September 2013 into April 2017

 Rhapsodie’s ideas to improve Medical ASSESSMENTS by doctors

PAIN Variables

 

#04- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with JUST Rate Pain from 0 to 10

From previous post- #03. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with A HIGH PAIN Tolerance– In the last 2 years I’ve suffered a lot more because doctors have failed to accurately assess situations based both on recorded lies in my files and the incomplete pain assessments.

Pain Assessments

The reasons for the relational corresponding pain chart are because of the repeated assessments done inaccurately, in my personal assessments, with me.  Please forgive me for only sharing a part of the situation, there are many areas that still have not been taken care of properly, but the pain assessments that lead investigations into injuries can cause a lot of problems if done wrong.

When a doctor asks you how much pain you are in do they do the correct work or could they do more? 

I can guarantee from the services for me that THEY CAN DEFINITELY DO MORE.

Inaccurate General Pain Assessments

At times more assessment is taken, but often not by the doctors.  In fact prescriptions for physical therapy, pain killers, and/or other drugs could result because the tests done are not accurately assessed based on the pain response by the patient to the “Rate your pain level from 0 to 10,”  which is too singular to make an accurate assessment.  Any person with a higher OR lower pain tolerance can hugely vary based on their personal rating of their pain as well as their body tolerances with pain.

With HIGH pain tolerance a person is less likely to be reacting like they are in horrid pain, but their pain problems could be tremendously worse than a person with a much lower pain tolerance while being uncared for because of the inaccurate way that doctors’ have assessed the situations. This was displayed for me because I had to assume how other people would be feeling with the injury of my LEFT Arm Rotator Cuff to fake in a number to get attention.  The MRI proved my reasoning and actions were correct, and my other personal experiences are some evidence of this.  The sample of experiences showed earlier are only some samples if there was a relational corresponding pain chart that more accurately fit information better treatment could result.

Another aspect of the problems comes with the assessment by doctors of Chronic Pain, when a patient like me hear that say, “My pain is not always there, it is not the same in the exact same area after a week of suffering it.  The pain I have at times totally disappears, so how can they make the assessment that the pain is ‘Chronic.’ In fact my perception of the word Chronic is, ‘It never ends and it never changes and it never goes away.’  My one experience with a pain that felt Chronic was a migraine that just grew for over 5 hours.  Nothing else I have had has felt like that.

The least thing that could be done is for doctors to have correspondence about other life situations and our pain assessments of those. Would you please relate any previous experiences so I can understand your rating now? Like a migraine or an infection or another injury.  Someone like me could say, ‘I fractured my lower left calf in gym at school, walked home, took some aspirin, wrapped my leg in ice, then went to the bedroom and put the bone in place, I passed out once, the pain was about a 6.  But it wasn’t bad enough to make me throw up.’

How Pain Assessments Generally Begin

Wouldn’t it be more relational for them when I’m telling them now that I felt like passing out with pain from some recent physical therapy with my lower left leg?  At least sharing the information that after passing out for over 30 minutes and standing up with an injury to my right calf, my pain was about at 7, but I walked out of it would give them some correspondence in understanding my meaning.  In general with no relational corresponding pain chart or more details for pain assessments there is more space for inaccuracies when doctors ONLY ask, ‘How much pain are you in? Rate your levels from 0 to 10.’  With just that question how do the doctor’s really assess my pain?

  • Based on their previous patients?
  • Based on their own personal experiences?
  • Based on what they think the problem really is?

How do any these assessments accurately assess MY PAIN?

In fact THEY DO NOT, it’s all a guess for them!

Associated Posts

Please forgive me, but you’ll likely want to right click and open in a new tab, because the click link MAY NOT WORK.

#01. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments CAN CAUSE MORE BODY DAMAGE

#02- PAIN Assessments Corresponding with UTI’s

#03. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with A HIGH PAIN Tolerance

#04- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with JUST Rate Pain from 0 to 10

#05- Inaccurate Doctoral PAIN Assessments based on Guesses

#06- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments because of no Patient Pain Understanding

#07- Inaccurate PAIN Ratings with NO Applicable Associations

#08- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments MADE a BIT Better

#09- Detailing Diaries Could Limit Inaccurate PAIN Assessments

#10- A PAIN & Injury Diary MAY Change Inaccurate Doctoral ASSESSMENTS

Rhapsodie’s Visual PAIN Diary- From September 2013 into April 2017

 Rhapsodie’s ideas to improve Medical ASSESSMENTS by doctors

PAIN Variables

 

#02- PAIN Assessments Corresponding with UTI’s

As stated previously with #01. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments CAN CAUSE MORE BODY DAMAGEThere hasn’t been any doctor who has taken the time to read the complete record of statements from me, like the fact that the best pain treatment has been ANTIBIOTICS that in addition to MY SUPER HIGH PAIN TOLERANCE as was shown with a urinary tract infection (UTI) some years ago has led me to suffering more and more with time and NO TREATMENT to care for the real problems. 

With the UTI I had been urinating bloodily and the doctor who examined the test results because of the emergency visit to his office said that the numbers were so bad he’d be screaming in pain.  I rated that pain at somewhere near ONE, like felt infrequently, but in urinating to a slight degree.  Because the doctor took the time to listen to me, and to know that peeing blood was not normal, the test was done before he even heard me state what my assessment of the pain was.  Meaning I wasn’t rejected as a patient.

I needed to have evidence for him to understand my problem, otherwise the generalized assessments of pain or infection when you are asked ‘How do you rate your pain on a 0 to 10 scale,’ can be inaccurately diagnosed if doctors if they do not have a relational corresponding pain chart per patient to use or relational elements to understand.  For my personal ratings 0 is no pain; 5 is half incapacitating pain; and 10 is fully unable to do anything pain like I had one time with a massive migraine.  Maybe other people rate differentially with the scales also, because the 10 migraine rating for me meant it was strong enough that nausea ended with barfing and the headache ended.

But others are not me, so things that are comparable are often more understandable.  AS would be a way that allows a medical person asking ‘How do you rate your pain on a 0 to 10 scale,’ the ability to relate your to your rating of pain better.  That’s why I have some other ideas about professional relational corresponding pain charts.

Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) Compared:

Let me illustrate this for you, using bacterial Urinary Tract pain assessments of my pain in comparison with statements shared from other people with me.  As stated previously, MY SUPER HIGH PAIN TOLERANCE as was shown with a urinary tract infection (UTI) some years ago has led me to suffering more and more with time and NO TREATMENT to care for the real problems. With the UTI I had been urinating bloodily and the doctor who examined the test results because of the emergency visit to his office said that the numbers were so bad he’d be screaming in pain.  I rated that pain at somewhere near ONE, like felt infrequently, but in urinating to a slight degree.

Medical Reports about UTI’s are generally more common with women but men can have them also because there are various reasons for UTI’s and there are various tests and symptoms as well as the variable pain factors from patients:

…Symptoms

Symptoms of urinary tract infections may include:

  • Strong urge to urinate frequently, even immediately after the bladder is emptied
  • Painful burning sensation when urinating
  • Discomfort, pressure, or bloating in the lower abdomen
  • Pain in the pelvic area or back
  • Cloudy or bloody urine, which may have a strong smell

A urine test can determine if these symptoms are caused by a bacterial infection. Antibiotics are used to treat UTIs. Older people may have a urinary tract infection but have few or no symptoms.

Treatment

Antibiotics are used to treat UTIs. Most cases of UTIs clear up after a few days of drug treatment, but more severe cases may require several weeks of treatment…

We could go into detailed research, but a simple illustration can illustrate the whole misalignment of the rate your pain system as it presently is between doctors and patients.  Take the time to examine the following illustration and please follow along with me in considering how to fix this problem.

While both patients have rated their pain, they each feel differently a doctor really cannot accurately any correspondence for care of the patient because there is a failure to establish a related baseline assessment of pain in a relational way.  Thus more is needed to gather a relational corresponding pain chart per patient to use by doctors for more accurate assessments or another value to correspond the pain rating with.

While both patients have rated their pain, they each feel differently a doctor really cannot accurately any correspondence for care of the patient because there is a failure to establish a related baseline assessment of pain in a relational way.  Thus more is needed to gather a relational corresponding pain chart per patient to use by doctors for more accurate assessments or another value to correspond the pain rating with.

There have been many occasions on doctor’s visits in the last 3 years that they have asked me to rate my pain in a level from 0 to 10, but I can only rate as I feel.  But the doctors cannot make accurate assessments just based on those numbers.  They need to have a real level to vary my level of and they need to have a way to keep the people who are really suffering accurately cared for or they will stupidly make inaccurate judgements as they have with me for over 2 years now…

Associated Posts

Please forgive me, but you’ll likely want to right click and open in a new tab, because the click link MAY NOT WORK.

#01. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments CAN CAUSE MORE BODY DAMAGE

#02- PAIN Assessments Corresponding with UTI’s

#03. Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with A HIGH PAIN Tolerance

#04- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments with JUST Rate Pain from 0 to 10

#05- Inaccurate Doctoral PAIN Assessments based on Guesses

#06- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments because of no Patient Pain Understanding

#07- Inaccurate PAIN Ratings with NO Applicable Associations

#08- Inaccurate PAIN Assessments MADE a BIT Better

#09- Detailing Diaries Could Limit Inaccurate PAIN Assessments

#10- A PAIN & Injury Diary MAY Change Inaccurate Doctoral ASSESSMENTS

Rhapsodie’s Visual PAIN Diary- From September 2013 into April 2017

 Rhapsodie’s ideas to improve Medical ASSESSMENTS by doctors

PAIN Variables

 

#11- About Government & Regulation vs. LOVE & Freedom

The “U.S. Constitution has been shared in some slight degree with the recent posts here, but so have contentions about the government and how it’s regulations diverge from the “Constitution”.  Because of this please remember that the theme of that document defines the purpose of the regulations in that document:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote [get behind, boost, not make] the general welfare, and secure [fortify, preserve, assure, (Webster’s New World Thesaurus, 1990)]] the blessings of liberty [the rights supposedly natural to man- freedom; independence; power of choice, (Webster’s New World Thesaurus, 1990)] to ourselves and our posterity [our children’s future, our descendant’s future, (Webster’s New World Thesaurus, 1990)], do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

A document prepared by men of faith, that to a degree professed a belief in God’s hand in this government and who worked, in Rhapsodie’s opinion towards LOVE.  There are multiple comments shared with the statements of previous posts, but it’s always important to remember and connect the theme of the “U. S. Constitution to the articles & sections of the “U.S. Constitution” with interpretations of it.

Take for example how the Commerce Clause interpretation, from the Constitutional definition, has affected freedom and LOVE while increasing the power of the dollar and the government.  The clause is constitutionalized under stare decisis because the Supreme Court made this judgement in interpretation, in 1832 the federal government is now empowered to control all commerce in the United States, unless they determine that there is an unsubstantial effect to interstate commerce with a business.

Rhapsodie has read multiple legal cases that cause her to see this as bad, not good for the free people in the United States. “In 1942, for example, the Supreme Court held that wheat production by an individual farmer intended wholly for consumption on his own farm was subject to federal regulation.” (Clarkson, 2012) How would an individual’s consumption of wheat raised on his own land, in his own state for eating by his own family cause ANY problem with interstate trade? Oh, maybe it would mean he wouldn’t buy wheat from another state, but he could buy wheat from his own state anyway, so this interpretation has led to federal regulation, not freedom for the people.

While the commerce clause interpretation could have legitimate value and purpose, the 175, size 6 font, double column, text book sized, pages of the U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code) is just a section of the law used to control people by business in the United States and this controlling effects the Native American peoples also. It’s not based on freedom and lLOVE it’s based on control and maximization of money in controlling. The blessings of liberty are actually minimized with these laws; the general welfare of the public is diminished by capturing souls in the cost of life with national healthcare and its minimization of the people’s control of their own lives.

This short dissertation shows how the actions that don’t demonstrate LOVE can fail, and since “LOVE never fails” there’s a need to make sure all regulations and control systems are done with a base of LOVE instead of Selfish Pride. The theme for the whole “United States Constitution shows that these shared aspects of control are unconstitutional and ungodly, at least in accord with Rhapsodie’s interpretations. But her sharing here is only based on a limited examination of the history of the United States and the definitions of this country. There is more for you to see, so read even if you decide to disagree.

READ MORE:

#10- About Government & Regulation vs. LOVE & Freedom

On her opinion that neither the Executive Branch, the president of the U.S., or the Legislative branch would have any rights in altering the laws of a people viewed as individual nations. They also shouldn’t have any right to diminish freedom of all because of the fear of a few. There may have been alterations to the regulations or laws in accord with the Native American’s, but they aren’t Constitutional amendments.  There are also more present discrepancies, with regards to present law and regulations in the United States versus Constitutional definitions. Let’s start with defining property, isn’t it possession that is not another’s?

Land, money, furniture any property can be undermined by diminished wealth, if the value of the money I make at work is minimized by the government, because of National Health Care, then why should I work for any extra? If I pay for everyone else’s health care with the work I do, why should I work at all? If the freedom I was promised from the property and prosperity I gain is given to others why should I continue to care about life or other’s lives? Versus the Puritan work ethic, which endures in the North East of the United States, and in Rhapsodie’s opinion, which empowers a person who works to the value of the work done, the money gained growing freedom’s power with the knowledge of the value shared with the world versus the government regulations have taken the empowerment away from the people.

  • Article II, section 3 [The President, of the United States,] shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend [give advice in regards] to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; . . .
  • Article II, section 9 The migration or importation of such persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited [there is no approval mentioned] by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight [1808], but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person. . . {No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.}5
  • Article II, section 8 The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States [the nation, not the individualized people]; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform [as in the SAME] throughout the United States; . . . To establish a uniform [the SAME] rule of naturalization . . .
  • Article II, section 6 The Senators and Representatives shall receive a . . . compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United States.
  • Article I, section 8 The Congress shall have Power . . . To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, [shared in section 8 ONLY] and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

Which to Rhapsodie means in accord with the theme of the whole constitution, “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote [get behind, boost, not make] the general welfare, and secure [fortify, preserve, assure, (Webster’s New World Thesaurus, 1990)]] the blessings of liberty [the rights supposedly natural to man- freedom; independence; power of choice, (Webster’s New World Thesaurus, 1990)] to ourselves and our posterity [our children’s future, our descendant’s future, (Webster’s New World Thesaurus, 1990)], do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Not for the judicial, legislative, or executive governors of this country, but for the people of this land now and into the future.

  • Article I, section 8 To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;” which was in 1824 interpreted, by the Supreme Court with a controlling and freedom diminishing definition. “The Court ruled that commerce within the states could also be regulated by national government as long as commerce substantially affected commerce involving more than one state.” (Clarkson, 2012)
READ MORE:

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: